On Thursday, I had this nice conversation with Jessica (@AvsAngel14). I’d recommend following her if you don’t mind a nice woman who knows more about sports than you do.
Anyways, our conversation sparked an interesting topic I’m bringing up, and my first off-topic of the year.
On page 2
Each sport in North America has a different system on teams, players and progression. For example, Major League Baseball has its famous farm system and nested levels. The NHL has a similar system, though it’s not as pronounced. Actually it’s more of a mess but I’ll get into it later. The NBA and NFL don’t have any such system, instead they relegate their farm system be the colleges, and use a draft (or lottery in the case of the NBA.) The lesser known sports don’t really have any system, since there are less players/teams involved (and a lower fanbase) so I’m not going to talk about them.
For the most part this seems to work in 3 of the 4 sports. Hockey is more of a mess on the lower levels, because you not only have college hockey teams like DU and CC, but you also have a bunch of minor league professional teams as well. One of my favorite teams, the Colorado Eagles, is an interesting case. From their inception in 2003 until 2011, they played in the Central Hockey League. If I had to compare it using baseball terms, this is an independent AA-league. With the massive sellouts (over 350 if we count this year, basically every home game since they opened), this was a contributing factor for the Eagles to switch to the ECHL as of this season. The ECHL is one of 2 official farm teams under the NHL CBA, and is also classified as a AA league. (The other is the American Hockey League (AHL), and is AAA-caliber.) As such, I’m learning what it is like to be a real farm team, seeing players move more often, whether it’s to our affiliates (Winnipeg Jets & St. John’s Ice Caps), or to other teams, and how that affects our bench. So this is one way players move up and down in hockey.
But like I discussed with Jessica, the NHL has other ways to acquire players: colleges have also been seen as sources, and some skip it altogether, like young Matt Duchene. Some colleges seem to be in rebuilding mode every 2 years because they then get absorbed by NHL (though Jessica admitted CC hardly has a problem with losing players.) But it makes the NHL a real mess, as they get players through the draft, but also their development teams, and outside free agents, without protection for other minor teams/leagues. Is there a good solution?
I asked if we use a European-style system, where instead of moving players, we move teams based on performance. If you’re not familiar with this, I’ll take the Swedish hockey leagues as an example since I spent 6 years there. They had 6 different levels, and the “Elitserien” was the highest level with 16 teams. The 2 worst teams have to earn their right to remain up with the 2 best teams of the lower level. It’s like a playoff of the worst teams. If you were to compare this on a player level, it’s like a MLB player that does well will get a good look by the Yankees. But if a player doesn’t do well, they’d be lucky to get a look by the Royals. An extreme case, but I think you get my point. I found that in this case, a farm team to a “Classic” elite team found itself in Elitserien, while the classic team dropped, which was funny and ironic at the same time. This type of system puts emphasis not only on players, but also on management to perform if they want to stay up. It’s an interesting system.
Unfortunately, it wouldn’t work in the NFL or the NBA because there is nothing except the college “amateur” level. (I could have seen the NBA splitting itself like this before the lockout happened.) It would also not be feasible in MLB for many reasons. MLB already has an excellent farm system built in by Branch Rickey, and has systems to prevent it from ‘leeching’ from other leagues and countries like Japan. (It also has 2 leagues playing with slightly different rules.) I’d like to see the NHL try it, but I believe they are too big to manage it now. In fact, sports in North America are a huge market now.
Let’s just play ball…
Today’s post brought to you thanks to Jessica (@AvsAngel14) and Erik (@nt_eagle)
Under Further Review
Okay, the latest, if you go by my twitter timeline, is that the football season has ended… Oh, I’m sorry, that’s Denver Broncos and Tebow’s season ended. Thank God, as he was more popular than Osama bin Laden’s death. Now, can we have baseball?
Other than football, it’s been a relatively quiet week. Rockies haven’t had any action, though Carlos Gonzalez says his arm is fine, and Charlie Blackmon is smarter. … and Renck still issues concerns about the pitching rotation. But otherwise, nothing new… except that Pomeranz is also calmer with the dropped disturbing the peace charges.
In hockey, the Avalanche lost a home-and-home series with Nashville this week (the away game was dropped in overtime). But they managed to win Saturday in Dallas. They have a busy schedule this week, with 3 of the next 4 games this week on the road against Phoenix (Monday), LA (Saturday), and Anaheim (Sunday). The only break is Wednesday’s home game vs. Florida.
The Eagles won Wednesday at home vs. Utah, but split the last weekend series at Bakersfield, losing Friday and winning Saturday. This week they play today at Las Vegas unusually early (3:05pm MST), and then the weekend series at Ontario Reign.
I really hope for more baseball news this week… there’s only 33 days left till Spring Training starts. (Pitchers & Catchers report)
Sliding home
My final quote comes from Krista (@astoria922). It’s priceless:
@druidlove I think that game was bad. And in all honesty, I think the the entire season was one huge clusterfuck.